discussions about Twister Anti-TrojanVirus
-
ftfans
- Site Admin
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:18 am
Post
by ftfans » Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:08 am
renegade wrote:I hope that detection rate would be above 90 % at least.
And 94-96% would be a real turn over for this guy.
I wish the best for Twister.
I am quite sure that the detection rate would be above 95%.
What I am afraid of is the fault posstive.
Thought it seems that Twister acts good in some test, but in the daily use, there is a problem as FP.
I am not officer from Filseclab, LOL
-
3DFireStarteR
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:27 pm
Post
by 3DFireStarteR » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:33 am
I really wanna know damn it...... i want av-comparitives to test it so i can just find out, since they used Huge amounts of samples, i have been constantly submitting rogue software to twister for the last 2 days so hopefully that will help
-
Zetelo
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:12 pm
Post
by Zetelo » Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:26 pm
Yes, it would be very interesting indeed to see how Twister's performance will be. Maybe it's gonna be the AV of the year 2009, who knows
(would make a party then
, all Twistees invited)
-
Fuzzfas
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:40 am
Post
by Fuzzfas » Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:22 pm
3DFireStarteR wrote:I really wanna know damn it...... i want av-comparitives to test it so i can just find out, since they used Huge amounts of samples, i have been constantly submitting rogue software to twister for the last 2 days so hopefully that will help
Good job! That's actually one of Twister's major disadvantages. Not many people know it and so they don't submit samples.
For the history i post here too the results from the Wilder's thread.
Twister:
http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/6809/14200214vw9.png
Avira:
http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/7717/71369991yc5.png
Dr Web Cure it.
http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/2905/29875166ht5.png
Well, at least it beat Dr. Web by far and missed about 110 samples compared to Avira. And my impression was the Twister scanned them faster than both. Also, consider that FDDS is one of Twister's strong features and wasn't activated in this test because it was on demand. So overall, i d say it was respectable performance.
-
3DFireStarteR
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:27 pm
Post
by 3DFireStarteR » Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:06 pm
Thats why i'm makeing sure i raise its rogue detection.
811 rogue samples sent in 4 days, AV-360 / MalwareDefence / Load.exe's / Anti-virus 2009/2008/2010/ and many more.
-
Fuzzfas
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:40 am
Post
by Fuzzfas » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:04 pm
3DFireStarteR wrote:Thats why i'm makeing sure i raise its rogue detection.
811 rogue samples sent in 4 days, AV-360 / MalwareDefence / Load.exe's / Anti-virus 2009/2008/2010/ and many more.
811?!
If you keep at this pace, Twister's detection will grow rapidly!
-
3DFireStarteR
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:27 pm
Post
by 3DFireStarteR » Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:53 am
I plan too, Its not overly difficult, i think filseclab's job at adding them to the databace is alot harder then my skill at finding new rogues.
Aslong as they keep doing there job ile keep doing mine
XttX://yourchristmaslights.com/ - I <3 you, But not really, Don't download its active malware, but you would be supprised how many people fall for stuff like that xD
-
Fuzzfas
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:40 am
Post
by Fuzzfas » Wed Jan 28, 2009 8:20 am
3DFireStarteR wrote:I plan too, Its not overly difficult, i think filseclab's job at adding them to the databace is alot harder then my skill at finding new rogues.
Aslong as they keep doing there job ile keep doing mine
XttX://yourchristmaslights.com/ - I <3 you, But not really, Don't download its active malware, but you would be supprised how many people fall for stuff like that xD
Yes, if they are 20 people, they must work like mad to add all malware that arrives to them... Thanks for the link! I loved it! "Love.exe". Ahahah! "Please download your love.exe and execute and Merry Xmas!".